TheAustinMortgageGuy.com

Market Update 10/15/2009

 

CAN YOU SAY VOLITILE?!? MBS prices have been all over the board this morning, and are now down quite a bit (FNMA 4.50 -7/32) on some decent economic data.  The stock market is also down (Dow -27.96, S&P -3.99) after a good run these past few days.  Consumer Price data held no surprises as it came in essentially on target (CPI 0.2% vs. 0.2% est., Core CPI 0.2% vs. 0.1% est.).  The Philly Fed print came in worse than expected (11.5 vs. 12.0 est.), while the NY Manufacturing Index came in far better than expected (34.57 vs. 17.25 est.).  Initial Jobless Claims also came in better than expected (514k vs. 520 est.) dropping the 4-week average from 540.5k to 531.5k.  It is unclear where the market will trend the rest of the day.

 

Tomorrow, Friday, 10/16 brings Industrial Production (est. 0.1%) and Consumer Sentiment (est. 73.5).  Industrial Production will be watched for more signs of improvement in economic activity.  A better than expected read here may put upward pressure on rates.  An inline number or worse may keep rates in check.  Again, Consumer Sentiment is not a true economic indicator, but it does shed light on the mentality of the American consumer.  The American consumer will drive us out of this current funk we are in, so his/her feelings cannot be ignored.  A better than expected number may put upward pressure on rates, as the markets will see this as a sign that spending may pick up.  A worse than expected print may send rates lower, as consensus will figure that consumers will continue to hold tight on their wallets, stunting a would-be recovery. 

 

 

Will Staney

Sr. Mortgage Banker

WJ Bradley Mortgage Capital

12444 Research Blvd. Ste. 103

Austin, TX 78759

(512) 377-1468 Office

(512) 644-1587 Cell

(866) 953-0155 Fax

www.wjbradley.com

My Twitter

My Blogs

My Facebook Business Page

My Linkedin

 

0 commentsWilliam Staney • October 15 2009 12:07PM

Market Update 10/14/2009

 

MBS prices are down on the day (FNMA 4.50 -3/32), but off of session lows.  The stock market is in rally mode (Dow +111.93, S&P +13.56).  Earnings continue to be strong.  Intel and JP Morgan both easily topped expectations.  The dollar index is at a 12 month low.  These are all going to be bond-negative as strong earnings and a stock market rally imply economic stabilization/health and a weak dollar suggests inflation concerns.  Import prices posted a 0.6% increase, while export prices were flat.  These had little impact in bond prices.  Retail Sales came in better than expected (-1.5% vs. -2.1% est.), but looked to be influenced by auto sales.   Retails Sales, excluding auto purchases, came in worse than expected (-0.5% vs. +0.2 est.).  Business Inventories gave some support to bond prices as the print came in worse than expected (-1.50% vs. -1.0% est.).  The minutes from the Sept. FOMC meeting will be released at noon MT.  Watch for the contents to be dissected by the media for signs of change in FED policy, stance, or outlook.  Again, talk of an improving economy and/or mention of tapering off of their open market accommodations may press rates higher.  If they look to be leaning more towards extending these programs and/or they are seeing a tougher road ahead than previously expected, rates may stay in check. 

 

Tomorrow, Thursday, 10/15 has Consumer Price data on tap.  CPI (est. +0.2%) and Core CPI (est. +0.1%) will be released at 6:30am MT.  It wouldn't be Thursday without the weekly Jobless Claims data (est. 525k).  We will also see the NY Empire State Index and the Philly FED.  Consumer Price data should be watched for signs of accelerating inflation.  Inflation is a piece of the puzzle that has yet to rear its head.  There are expectations worldwide that inflation will become a problem as we recover from our current down-turn.  If/when these concerns become reality, bond prices are likely to suffer as inflation is a key driver when the FED decides to raise (or not to raise) interest rates.  A higher than expected CPI print may push rates higher, while a lower print will likely keep rates in check.  The Indexes out of PA and NY should be watched as well.  These indexes track manufacturing, prices, and employment in their respective regions.  Any strong increases here may put upward pressure on rates.  As always, watch that Jobless Claims number.  It tends to make the headlines and move markets regardless of its volatile tendencies. 

 

 

Will Staney

Sr. Mortgage Banker

WJ Bradley Mortgage Capital

12444 Research Blvd. Ste. 103

Austin, TX 78759

(512) 377-1468 Office

(512) 644-1587 Cell

(866) 953-0155 Fax

www.wjbradley.com

My Twitter

My Blogs

My Facebook Business Page

My Linkedin

 

 

0 commentsWilliam Staney • October 14 2009 02:12PM

Market Update 10/09/2009

 

MBS prices are faltering this morning (FNMA 4.50 -22/32) on talk of possible rate hikes and reigning in some of the FED's accommodative programs.  There is also a hangover from the poor 30 year auction seen yesterday.  As we discussed, the 30 year Treasury auction was poor by recent standards.  The market may also have been a little overbought these past few weeks.  Some of the trade today looks to be corrective.  The Trade Balance (or imbalance as it were) came in lower than expected at -$30.78 Bil. vs. a -$32.9 Bil. estimate.  This is unlikely to have influenced today's' downward movement.  Stocks are up (Dow +33.93, S&P +1.78) again and the dollar is strengthening, adding some fuel to the sell-off.  Basically, all of the talk and market data today is bond-negative.

 

Next week brings far more data than we saw this week, even though data will only be released Wed-Fri.  Wednesday has Import/Export Prices, Retail Sales, Business Inventories, and FOMC Minutes on tap.  Thursday, is Initial Claims (as usual), Consumer Price data, and the Philly Fed Index.  On Friday, we have Capacity Utilization, Industrial Production, and UofM Preliminary Consumer Sentiment.  Pretty much any of these has the potential to move rates.  We will discuss in more detail as the announcements approach.  Also keep an eye on corporate earnings announcements.  The perceived health of the US business environment will have an impact rates.  As always, positive results may push rates lower, while poor earnings may keep rates in check. 

 

Have a great weekend!

 

 

Will Staney

Sr. Mortgage Banker

WJ Bradley Mortgage Capital

12444 Research Blvd. Ste. 103

Austin, TX 78759

(512) 377-1468 Office

(512) 644-1587 Cell

(866) 953-0155 Fax

www.wjbradley.com

My Twitter

My Blogs

My Facebook Business Page

My Linkedin

 

0 commentsWilliam Staney • October 09 2009 01:04PM

Market Update 10/08/2009

 

MBS prices are up on the session (FNMA 4.50 +4/32), but currently trading sideways.  Jobless Claims came in lower than expected (521k vs. 540 est.), although not by much.  Wholesale Inventories were worse than expected (-1.3% vs. -1.0 est.).  The stock market is in rally mode again today (Dow +100.13, S&P +12.01) on strong earnings, a weakening dollar, and not-so-bad Initial Claims.  Yesterday's 10 year Treasury Auction was strong (3.01 bid-to-cover, 47.4% foreign bidder take), but today's 30 year showing was not so great (2.37 bid-to-cover, 34.5% foreign bidder take).  So, we saw a weak rally surrounding the 10 year results, but there will likely be no follow-through on today's less-than-stellar 30 year offering.  But, we will likely not see a near-term sell-off either. 

 

Tomorrow, Friday, 10/9 has little data and auctions are over for the week.  The lone data point tomorrow is the Trade Balance (est. -32.9 Bil.).  The Trade Balance print measures the difference between US imports and exports of goods and services.  Surprises here can influence estimates on GDP and other broad economic measures.  Large disparities in the Trade Balance number may move rates.  However, lately, no real rate movement has come following the Trade Balance print. 

 

Earnings season has begun.  If you recall from our discussion last season, earnings reports are a strong driver of market movement.  With expectations beaten down in the midst of our worst recession in 75 years, eyes will be on these earnings reports for signs of improving business conditions.  Also recall that headlines indicating that companies are "beating" earnings expectations may be misleading as we have to remember that many companies will intentionally look to lower earnings expectation, so they may ensure a "win".  That's not to say that earnings releases should be ignored; they should just not be given too much weight.  A win is a win, as they say, but keep it in the context of a weak market and weak expectations.  In any case, a strong earnings season is likely to prolong the current bull market in stocks, thus putting upward pressure on rates.  Weak earnings may keep rates in check, as the FED will be less likely to raise rates if business is slow and inflation is contained. 

 

Will Staney

Sr. Mortgage Banker

WJ Bradley Mortgage Capital

12444 Research Blvd. Ste. 103

Austin, TX 78759

(512) 377-1468 Office

(512) 644-1587 Cell

(866) 953-0155 Fax

www.wjbradley.com

My Twitter

My Blogs

My Facebook Business Page

My Linkedin

 

 

 

0 commentsWilliam Staney • October 08 2009 12:47PM

Market Update - 10/5/2009

 

MBS prices are up a bit on the session (FNMA 4.50 +2/32), although are losing steam after a weak rally earlier today.  The ISM Services Index came in slightly higher than expected (50.9 vs. 50.0 est.).  This had little impact on the bond markets.   The stock market is up (Dow +68.39, S&P +9.85) adding to downward pressure in MBS prices (rates up).  No more data will be released today, but watch for the stock market and talk of the upcoming Treasury auctions to provide bias for bond traders. 

 

Tomorrow, Tuesday, 10/6 is another dead day for data.  No economic data will be released, but we have the 3yr Treasury note auction at 11am MT.  This is the first of three note offering this week.  As we know, these auctions will be seen as a barometer of foreign and domestic demand for US debt, and debt instruments in general.  Watch for a bid-to-cover of 2.50+ and an indirect bidder participation of 50%+.  Again, the bid-to-cover number is the ratio of orders placed to orders filled.  It is a direct indication of demand for a given offering.  The indirect bidder participation percentage is a reflection or foreign demand for the same offering.  Typically, we see foreign buyers purchase at least half of any given note issue.  Any perceived weakness in these numbers may spark a sell-off in bond markets (rates up), while another average or above average auction will likely keep bonds in check. 

 

As always, keep an eye on the stock market.  We had a sharp sell-off in the stock market last Thursday that seemed to contribute to the strong MBS pricing we saw late in the week (rates down).  There still exists this feeling out there that a large scale stock market correction is looming.  So, any time we see a 150pts+ sell off in the US stock market, we are likely to see a short-term rally in bonds (rates down).  These stock market drops are more likely to move the bond markets that stock market rallies of the same magnitude.  This may be due to the media/analyst consensus that we almost need to have a sharp correction in stocks before we see any further significant gains.  So, any sign of a stock market stall will beget temporary buying of bonds as a safety play.

 

 

Will Staney

Sr. Mortgage Banker

WJ Bradley Mortgage Capital

12444 Research Blvd. Ste. 103

Austin, TX 78759

(512) 377-1468 Office

(512) 644-1587 Cell

(866) 953-0155 Fax

www.wjbradley.com

My Twitter

My Blogs

My Facebook Business Page

My Linkedin

 

 

 

0 commentsWilliam Staney • October 05 2009 12:34PM

2009 Tax Credit Helps First-Time Buyers Become Home Owners

2 commentsWilliam Staney • October 02 2009 12:02PM

Market Update 10/2/2009

 

MBS prices are up slightly (FNMA 43.50 +2/32) after a sharp drive upward early in the session.  The Nonfarm payroll print came in far worse than expected (-263k vs. -175k est.).   This was likely the reason for the initial spike this morning.  Factory Orders hit worse than expected as well (-0.8% vs. 0.0% est.).  All of this should point to downward pressure on rates, yet we see the market having trouble holding a rally.  It is possible that the "whispers" heard on the street yesterday calling for a far worse than expected jobs report may have contributed to yesterday's rally.  So, today's poor employment report may have already been, at least partially, priced into the market; thus, the difficulty in finding upward momentum today.  The Unemployment Rate came in as expected at 9.8%.

 

Next week is light on data, but we have Treasury Auctions on tap to ensure that things stay interesting.  For data, we have ISM Services (est. 50.0) on Monday, Consumer Credit (est. -9.5 Bil.) and the Treasury Budget on Wednesday, Initial Claims and Wholesale Inventories (est. -1.0%) on Thursday, and the Trade Balance (est. -32.9 Bil.) on Friday.  Of these, the ISM Services and the Initial Claims release will likely be the potential market movers.  The real news will be the auctions.  The US Treasury will auction another record offering consisting of $39 Bil of 3yr notes (Tues), $20 Bil in 10yr notes (Wed.) and $12 Bil. in 30yr notes (Thurs).  Watch again for signs of change in the demand for this and other debt instruments.  A perceived weakening of demand may push rates higher, while a solid performance may keep rates in check. 

 

Have a great weekend!

 

 

Will Staney

Sr. Mortgage Banker

WJ Bradley Mortgage Capital

12444 Research Blvd. Ste. 103

Austin, TX 78759

(512) 377-1468 Office

(512) 644-1587 Cell

(866) 953-0155 Fax

www.wjbradley.com

My Twitter

My Blogs

My Facebook Business Page

My Linkedin

 

0 commentsWilliam Staney • October 02 2009 11:59AM

Market Update - 10/1/2009

 

MBS prices are on a steep climb today (FNMA 4.50 +11/32) after a boring day yesterday (FNMA 4.50 -1/32).   The stock market is off quite a bit today  (Dow -149.94, S&P -19.26).  The major economic data released today was mostly negative, thus bond-positive.  ISM missed quite a bit (52.6 vs. 54.0 est.) and Initial Claims print came in heavy (551k vs. 535k est.).  However, some of the smaller data was mixed to positive.  Personal Income beat slightly (0.2% vs. 0.1% est.), Construction Spending was up more than expected (0.8% vs. -0.2%), and Pending Home Sales rose 6.4% vs. a 1.0% estimate.  As I write this, Ben Bernanke is testifying before the House on Financial Regulation.  The bond markets seem pleased with his remarks.  Watch for news on his testimony to hit news wires very shortly and for the contents to be reviewed closely for signals, hints, and hidden meaning.

 

Tomorrow, Friday, 10/2 has the Granddaddy of all economic data, the US Employment Report.  Nonfarm Payrolls are expected to drop 180k jobs this time around.  Consensus is on a 1/10th of a percent increase in the Unemployment rate to 9.8%, from the previous 9.7% reading.  Watch for the headline numbers to stir conversation if they come in out of whack, but also look for the details of these reports to be run through the ringer.  With eyes really focusing on employment as the last piece of the puzzle in our avoiding economic depression, every factor in the employment report will be watched for strength/weakness.  Look for the data to be digested during the day and for details to potentially move markets.

 

Will Staney

Sr. Mortgage Banker

WJ Bradley Mortgage Capital

12444 Research Blvd. Ste. 103

Austin, TX 78759

(512) 377-1468 Office

(512) 644-1587 Cell

(866) 953-0155 Fax

www.wjbradley.com

My Twitter

My Blogs

My Facebook Business Page

My Linkedin

 

 

0 commentsWilliam Staney • October 01 2009 02:10PM

The Welfare Mentality of the First Time Homebuyer's Tax Credit

Via Jeff Belonger -- The FHA Expert.com -- FHA Loans -- FHA mortgages - USDA loans (Infinity Home Mortgage Company, Inc):

 

Tough times in America

There has been a lot of buzz about extending the First Time Homebuyers Tax Credit. Why?  For two reasons...

  1. Because the $8,000 Tax Credit expires on November 30th, 2009.
  2. And because many have stated that these tax credits have stimulated the housing market and our economy.

 

We have heard mention of recession, great depression, inflation, economic default, hard times, etc, etc. Has the First Time Homebuyers Tax Credit helped the economy and the housing market? Yes, in some cases. But people, it's another gov't band aide.

 

 

 

printing money - the stimulus package

 

In regards to the tax credit, many have argued that it has gotten them more clients that would have never bought. My thought?  Home buying can be an emotional process. It can also lead to misinformation on why one might buy. I am a frim believer that people will buy anyhow. Did it get some off the fence?  Sure it did. Keep in mind, many real estate markets are different from each other.

But let me pose a question to everyone out there. Where do you think this money is coming from? Who do you think will be paying for this? Is our society a welfare mentality, just printing money that we don't have?  Should we run our Country like a business or as a soup kitchen?  Brian Brady added to my thought process with this eye opening post. Suspend the practice of flesh devouring : let the tax credit expire.

 

 

 

 

You can’t have your CAKE and EAT it too..

 

can't have your cake and eat it

What inspired me to write this post, was after reading the comments on Loreena Yeo's blog, Would Congress please extend the $8,000 tax credit.

People, let's be honest with ourselves. Are we also scared if the tax credit is not extended, that it could also hurt our commissions?  Just think about this. But what caught my attention were many of the comments on Loreena's post that said, "Please extend the tax credit", yet most of them didn't state why. And if they did, they said because it's helping the housing market. Based on whose facts?  Yes, this can be debated.

But what about this... many of these same realtors wanting to extend the tax credit, were the same ones that said one of two things... 

  1. You should have skin in the game (by Lenn Harley) or

  2. knocked the seller funded downpayment program, such as Nehemiah or AmeriDream

Shouldn't these same arguments be applied to the tax credit then, for those that are able to use the tax credit at closing?  Let me explain further....

 

 

 

Economic Recovery

So how do we get out of this mess and and have an Economic Recovery, which the real estate market is a big part of.

How about starting with unemployment.  Loreena argued that buying houses creates 100's of jobs, specific products would be bought.  I agree and disagree. Because you will also lose jobs in the process.

But let me get to my point. Shouldn't we find ways to a recovery that wouldn't cost the tax payers money?  I also read in many of the comments that the tax credit helps increase multiple offers in many areas, driving up the price of the home. Will many of you agree with this?

So prices have increased. Is this a ghost price?  A real price?  An inflationary price? If we accept this, why not bring back the seller funded down payment programs then? Known as the DPA programs.

 

 

 

 

Conclusion :  The argument on Capital Hill and amongst many realtors and loan officers has been that you need skin in the game. And then the next wave would argue against the DPA program, because it could inflate the price of the home. But we have established that the tax credit does the same. But wait, it is costing us tax payers money for the tax credit, yet the DPA program doesn't cost the tax payer any monies.

Overall, aren't we a powerful country?  With some of the smartest individuals, yet we are way in over our heads. What happened to common sense?  Are we just mere puppets of a gov't that says they know best for us?  Is our society a welfare mentality, just printing money that we don't have?  I thought I found some common sense solutions that I wrote about in June 2009. Call to Action - We must fix the real estate market ourselves.  Keeping in mind, that all of this is of my opinion, but with careful thinking and not of that of my pockets.

 

 

 

For other view points on this topic, please read :

  • The Press is On : By Lane Bailey -  I think this is a very good read and we should pay attention to this. He talks about stopping the tax credit.
  • We are going 35 mph, and about to hit the wall. - By Alan May - His complaint is that many people are rushing to take advantage of the tax credit. And that lenders with their delays will hurt buyers chances. Hey, I love helping first time homebuyers, but the tax credit has been around since 2008. If buyers waited last minute, do we keep extending, yet costing us millions of dollars in the future. What about inflation?  Inflation vs deflation - Is it criminal?

 

 

 

 

follow Jeff Belonger on Twitter               The FHA Expert     

                                                                                               FOLLOW ME ON FACEBOOK

 

 

- FHA Loans - USDA Loans - VA Loans -

- Energy Efficient Mortgages - 

- Conventional Loans - 203 k loans -

- Mortgages -

 

Experience & Knowledge at its BEST !!!

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________

For more information on FHA loans, please go to this link. The FHA Expert

For more information about the 2009 Tax Credit for First Time Homebuyers : 2009 Tax Credit

For important mortgage insight to watch for, please read : Consumers need to be aware of these Red Flags !!!!

Copyright © 2009 by Jeff Belonger of Infinity Home Mortgage Company, Inc

0 commentsWilliam Staney • September 23 2009 02:53PM

NHLA Regulatory Alert

This is huge! Please share with anyone in the Mortgage Industry.

Via National Home Loan Advocates:

Regulatory Alert R-1366

As you have probably heard by now, the Federal Reserve Board has issued two proposed rules making significant changes to Regulation Z (Truth in Lending). This stems from proposals in H.R. 1728 - the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act - which passed the house on May 7, 2009.

Essentially, the new amendments are positioned to provide new consumer protections for all home-secured credit... which by intent proposes many good things. But, as happens most of the time, this proposal has very dangerous components tucked within it.

One proposal that is embedded, which is written in an ambiguous way, would essentially wipeout the current compensation structure to loan officers... retail, correspondent, and broker. The FRB proposal would require mortgage lenders to pay originators - again, retail, correspondent, and brokers - a flat fee, which would be stated and disclosed upfront, and would not increase based on changes in the interest rate or other loan terms. This all sounds fair, but make no mistake, the target is on YSP, SRP, and compensation paid to all mortgage originators... with a goal of regulating and restricting them. In fact, in HR 1728 the term "banned" was used relative to YSP and SRP.

For all mortgage transactions the proposal would:

  • Prohibit payments to a mortgage broker or the creditor's loan officer based on the loan's interest rate or other terms.
  • Prohibit a mortgage broker or loan officer from "steering" consumers to a lender offering less favorable terms in order to increase the broker's or loan officer's compensation.

When you read this it sounds fair - especially to a consumer, but imagine the unintended consequences of eliminating the ability to structure financing options for a consumer based on their specific needs. Should you also make the same "flat fee" for a $100,000 loan as you would on a $1.3 million loan? And, as you know, the industry has self-regulated the "excessive" YSP and SRP abuses that were so prevalent in retail and third-party originations.

Please review these links and submit comments as you see fit. After going to this link, scroll down to proposal R-1366 to review the proposal and submit your comments.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/foia/proposedregs.cfm

Additionally, if you are a business owner, you can contact the SBA Advocacy group with your concerns and coments- they are very interested to support you as well.

http://www.sba.gov/advo/laws/law_regalerts.html

You may also want to email your Senator to articulate your position and concerns.

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

We have a link to a document that highlights all of the proposed rule changes for you to review. We have also attached a link to HR 1728 which will give you a greater sense of the big picture- too lengthy to highlight in this email. It is riddled with dangerous proposals to the housing industry.

 

http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/bcreg20090723a1.pdf

 

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/financialsvcs_dem/summary_of_hr_1728_--_03_26_09.pdf


We believe that the industry has self-regulated this topic effectively and while we should always be looking for ways to enhance consumer protection from unfair lending practices, we are of the opinion that there is a need for more debate and vetting of these proposals to ensure we get it right. Unfortunately there is a lot on the agenda on K Street and this could easily pass without a visible position from the industry.

We also believe that legislators are targeting things that were merely functions of the real problems that caused over-speculation in housing credit. Loose underwriting standards that were coupled with unregulated leverage (remember the Bear Stearns subprime fund that used 80:1 leverage?) created by Wall Street are more appropriate targets for regulation, certainly not compensation of a loan officer. There has also been an overly intense focus on any third-party originators- broker or correspondent- who were, at the end of the day, simply offering products and YSP structures allowed by the primary lenders / banks.

Too many times, we hear about these changes after they are accepted.  This is your opportunity to voice your comments and opinion. This opportunity to make public comment ends on November 27, 2009!

Share It! Sign-up a co-worker or friend for a 14-day free trial:
www.NationalHomeLoanAdvocates.com/RateAlertService 

 

Joshua Campbell

VP, Lender Relations

National Home Loan Advocates

Cell 972.904.3694

Fax 866.472.2891

josh.campbell@nationalhomeloanadvocates.com

www.nationalhomeloanadvocates.com

 

"Working for you and in your best interest"TM

3 commentsWilliam Staney • September 22 2009 06:35PM